Hill's Science Diet · 3,732 kcal/kg
Adult Sensitive Stomach & Skin Chicken & Barley
24.8% protein on a dry-matter basis.
Part of the Royal Canin Breed Health Nutrition line. On a dry-matter basis this recipe is 24.6% protein and 19% fat, at 3,803 kcal per kilogram (338 kcal per cup). Royal Canin publishes no AAFCO nutritional adequacy statement for this recipe.
Composition as sold · 0–100% of the food by weight
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter | g / 1,000 kcal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude protein (guaranteed min) | 22% | 24.6% | 57.8g |
| Crude fat (guaranteed min) | 17% | 19% | 44.7g |
| Crude fibre (guaranteed max) | 4.8% | 5.4% | 12.6g |
| Moisture (guaranteed max) | 10.5% | — | — |
| Carbohydrate (estimated) | ~37.7% | ~42.1% | ~99.1g |
Ingredients are listed by weight before cooking, so the first few describe most of what the recipe is made of — and nothing about the quality of any of them.
Chicken By-Product Meal · Brown Rice · Oat Groats · Chicken Fat · Corn · Brewers Rice · Corn Protein Meal · Natural Flavors
First 8 of the published list, in the manufacturer's order. The full list is on Royal Canin's product page ↗ .
Not published by Royal Canin
No nutritional adequacy statement appears on Royal Canin's public page for this recipe — AAFCO statement not captured cleanly from page; verify on label. Without it there is no published life-stage claim to report, so this page makes none. Check the panel on the pack.
The two wordings are different claims. Formulated to meet means the recipe was matched to an AAFCO nutrient profile on paper. Animal feeding tests using AAFCO procedures substantiate means the finished food was fed to dogs under a defined protocol — a minimum of eight dogs over twenty-six weeks. Both are legal standards of adequacy; only one involved dogs, and neither is a statement about ingredient quality. We quote whichever appears verbatim, and weight it in the score above: 20 points for a feeding trial, 12 for a formulation claim.
The feeding calculator turns this food's published calorie density into a daily portion for a given weight. The cost tool converts whatever you actually pay into a cost per 1,000 kcal, which is the only way to compare a subscription box against a bag.
Same format, nearest protein on a dry-matter basis. One food per brand, and this recipe's own brand is held back so the comparison actually crosses a brand line.
Hill's Science Diet · 3,732 kcal/kg
24.8% protein on a dry-matter basis.
Diamond Naturals · 3,425 kcal/kg
24.4% protein on a dry-matter basis.
Pedigree · 3,400 kcal/kg
25% protein on a dry-matter basis.
Purina Dog Chow · 3,469 kcal/kg
23.9% protein on a dry-matter basis.
Dry kibble · 3,513 kcal/kg
25.7% protein on a dry-matter basis.
Dry kibble · 3,482 kcal/kg
31.3% protein on a dry-matter basis.
Dry kibble · 3,616 kcal/kg
25.7% protein on a dry-matter basis.
Dry kibble · 3,869 kcal/kg
33.3% protein on a dry-matter basis.
Dry kibble · 3,744 kcal/kg
27.9% protein on a dry-matter basis.
Royal Canin: owner, recall record and every food we track
Everything above, as one square you can save or send. It is generated from this page's own figures, so it cannot drift from them, and it is ours to publish — no manufacturer supplied it and none can withdraw it.
Manufacturers reformulate without announcing it, and a website can lag a bag by months. The panel on the pack in your hand outranks this page; where the two disagree, the pack is right and we want to know.
Source royalcanin.com ↗ Captured 2026-07-25 Methodology